logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.26 2015고단8300
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a taxi for business use B.

On September 30, 2015, the Defendant, around 21:00, proceeded to the 472-lane road in front of a corporate bank located in the 472-dong, Seodo-dong, Busan, and led to the U.S.-dong section.

Since the location has a signal, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to the person engaged in driving service in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence that led to the left turn to the red fluor, caused the collision between the front part of the 125cc c., which was driven by the victim C (19C) (19C) who was driving in accordance with the new fluoral fluor, and the front part of the fluoral fluor and the front part of the fluoral fluor.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim’s death by occupational negligence, such as the heart rain, etc. caused by the heart pressure around 04:05 on October 1, 2015 while receiving treatment from the Busan University Hospital located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Road image photographs of CCTVs at the time of the accident, black images of vehicles booms, etc., and traffic reporting devices;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to death diagnosis reports and postmortem records;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The victim's bereaved family members and the victim's bereaved family members agree to the fact that the victim's stobane, who violated the reason for the sentencing of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and caused the death of the victim during the period of suspension of execution, caused the death of the victim due to the shock of the victim's stobane during the period of suspension of execution.

arrow