The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the defendant was committed by assaulting the victim in contingency, (b) the defendant was committed by assaulting the victim in F, (c) the defendant was committed by committing the assaulting the victim, (d) the defendant was divided by his mistake, and (e) the defendant was against himself, and (e) the degree of the defendant's participation is not much serious.

2. It does not seem that there is no change in circumstances to consider sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and there is no circumstance that the defendant made efforts to recover from damage. Considering the circumstance and motive leading up to the crime of this case, methods and contents of assault, degree and result of damage, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, environment, personality and conduct, etc., as well as various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, even if considering the circumstances the defendant asserts as grounds for appeal, it cannot

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.