logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.28 2016고정1306
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant did not have a good reputation against the victim C due to the bareboat assault accusation case.

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant was suspected of internal charges on the victim’s work together with approximately 30 residents of the Dong in order to prepare an emergency contact network from the 101st floor of the building D, Dongwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 101, the first floor of the 101-dong building, and the 30-dong residents’ office of the 101-dong.

No one was suspected of having filed a complaint as defamation as of assault;

D. The term "Is this two years," "Is this year," means whether the width is set up.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by openly putting about 30 people in front of the residents with approximately 30 people, such as "two years, less than one year, less than one year, and less than two years, after being dried up after being dried up after being dried up."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Recording notes, sound recording CDs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is true that the defendant expressed the victim's desire to do so as stated in its reasoning, but it was done with such words and conducts in the process of pointing out the victim's bodily conduct, and such acts of the defendant are excluded from illegality as a justifiable act that does not violate the social norms.

2. In full view of the evidence as indicated in the judgment, the following: (a) the content and method of the specific expression, the degree of the victim’s insulting sentiment, and the situation at the time, etc. recognized by the recorded file CD in which the situation was recorded; and (b) the Defendant’s act is not reasonable as the means or method of action is not reasonable; and (c) it cannot be recognized as supplementary performance; and (d) the Defendant and

arrow