1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. In order for H to embezzled compensation, the Plaintiff, who is a public official in charge of the Defendant, forged relevant documents as if the Plaintiff received compensation for the instant land, and thereafter commenced possession of the instant land without permission. As such, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s possession constitutes an occupation without permission for bad faith.

B. There is no evidence to prove that the Defendant’s act constitutes an illegal occupancy in bad faith, and there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant’s act constitutes an illegal occupancy in bad faith.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 6 (including each number), the fact that the compensation for the land of this case was calculated through the appraisal of obstacles to the land of this case and the adjustment of scarcitys, and that there was a protocol of settlement of compensation with the purport that the compensation was paid accordingly, the Defendant appears to possess the land of this case with the intent to own the land of this case through lawful acquisition procedures.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's main claim and the defendant's main counterclaim are all dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's main counterclaim is accepted as reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.