1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant SP corporation against the plaintiff A and B shall be revoked, and the revoked part shall be revoked.

Basic Facts

The reasoning is that the court below stated this part of the judgment of the court of first instance. The part of Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "G. Plaintiff A and B entered into a sales contract to purchase the apartment AA from Defendant S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Defendant S") with the price of KRW 950,000,000,000. The above sales contract contains the following: "71.11/7,664" and "71.11m2," and the land size is "71.11m2," and the special contract is "a sales contract in the actual state," and the description of the object of confirmation prepared at the time of the sales contract is "the total land size is 24,64.7m2, and the land size is 71.1m2,00m2," and "the ground for recognition" is added to "the ground for addition of Section 19 and No. 20," and thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 401.

The reasoning for this part of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the part of Article 9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of Article 8-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance ("2. plaintiffs' assertion"), except where the part of Article 9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance ("9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance") is used as the same as the part of

The 11th to 10th to 10th to 9th 10th 1 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

B. Defendant S, claiming the liability for damages arising from the occurrence of unused land among the instant apartment site, bears the duty under the good faith principle to prevent any blind spot from using and gaining profit from the site of the instant apartment by making the Plaintiffs and other buyers, etc. not to incur any unused land in the design and construction of the instant apartment site, etc.