logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.20 2016고단2266
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On June 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 27, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 19, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of the mobile phone store operated by the victim D, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on November 19, 2014, stating that “The Defendant would pay KRW 904,602 to her husband E’s mobile phone unpaid charge within one month from the Jeju-do, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, without the mold.”

However, the facts are that the defendant was bad credit and there was no specific property or any other income, and even if the victim pays the mobile phone fee on behalf of the victim, he/she did not have an intention or ability to pay the money within one month.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to transfer 904,620 won to a new bank account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. on the same day, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On November 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around November 24, 2014, at the cell phone store of the victim D’s mobile phone operation, the Defendant: (b) stated that “The Defendant would sell two mobile phone units on condition of opening a new mobile phone; (c) the Defendant sent the mobile phone sales proceeds to her husband E agricultural bank account; and (d) demanded the victim to immediately deposit KRW 415,000,000, out of the sales proceeds of the mobile phone with the agricultural bank account (Account Number: G) in the said E’s name.

The Defendant immediately stated that “The 415,000 won, which was remitted to the E account in the name of husband E, cannot be used as a suspension of transaction, and thus, would be repaid to the E account if he re-transfers KRW 415,00 to the H’s single bank account,” the Defendant stated that “The 415,000 won, which was remitted to the E account, shall not exceed one month.”

However, at the time, there was no transaction suspension, and there was no certain property or income as described in paragraph (1).

arrow