1. Defendant C’s KRW 65,823,871 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from June 12, 2018 to September 14, 2018, and the following.

The facts of the cause of the instant claim are identical to the facts stated in the attached Form, and Defendant C is not dissatisfied with them. As such, Defendant C is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 65,823,871 as the performance of the obligation to return unjust enrichment and the damages for delay calculated at a rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act from June 12, 2018 to September 14, 2018, which is the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of

The Plaintiff asserted that Defendant D was liable to pay the above amount as a reimbursement to the Plaintiff as a party to the contract, merely because it was merely the Plaintiff’s conclusion of the instant contract with Defendant C by lending the name of Defendant C, but it is insufficient to recognize it even if all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff was integrated. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion about Defendant D is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is justified, and the claim against the defendant D is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.