logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.02 2016나2412
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against plaintiffs A and C shall be modified as follows:

Attached Form

of the real estate listed in the list.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) using the phrase "in the absence of any evidence to acknowledge that the contract of donation was concluded" under Section 4 of Section 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the entry of No. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance is insufficient to recognize it only by the statement of evidence No. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) using the same part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for using the document No. 12 of the first instance as

2.(b)

The value of the donated real estate, which is the basis for calculating legal reserve of inheritance (A) shall be calculated at the price at the time of the commencement of inheritance where an ancestor died (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da17885, Feb. 9, 1996). According to the above facts, the value of the pertinent real estate, which is the basis for calculating legal reserve of inheritance, is KRW 1,493,751,00, or KRW 400,000,000, which is the amount of the pertinent donated property upon receipt by the Defendants, is KRW 1,093,751,00,000, and KRW 6,12, and KRW 3,77 (including each number), and KRW 100,000,000,000,000 won, which is the basis for calculating legal reserve of inheritance of inheritance of this case, is set at KRW 500,000,000,000 for each of the following statements.

arrow