beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On September 20, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written complaint with respect to C and D with intent to avoid, at the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station located in 99 Dong-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.
The contents of the above written complaint are “E”’s employees of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and the Defendant Nonparty Nonparty: (a) signed a contract for supply of goods between the complainant and F with the seal affixed by the complainant and F, who was lent for any other purpose around October 9, 2014.
“........”
However, the Defendant, while constructing a new urban-type residential housing building in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, intended to be supplied by E with internal supplies, such as T, singing, etc., and requested to lower the supply price to the person who is a staff member in charge of E, and entered into a contract between E and subordinate business, between the Defendant and E, and agreed on the supply price for goods between E and F, and the Si’s public service cost portion was at a discount of the Si’s public service cost amount, and there was no fact that the Defendant and F had used a forged goods supply contract between the Defendant and F.
Nevertheless, around October 6, 2016, the Defendant made a supplementary statement to the same effect as the above accusation to the police officers in charge at the investigation of the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station and the office of the first team in the economy as the above accusation.
Then, when the above case was not prosecuted (not suspected) on January 18, 2017, the defendant made a statement that, at the public service offices of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, the head of the defendant, at the public service offices of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, the head of the defendant made a complaint to the same purport as the above complaint, and on May 16, 2017, the head of the public service offices of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, at the public service offices of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, the head of the defendant made a statement that, on the same purpose as the above complaint, the defendant would punish the person who was without suspicion as the above complaint as the crime of forging the private document and the crime of conducting the above investigation documents.
In this respect, the defendant above C.