The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff, including the part resulting from the participation.

1. As to the instant case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a partial revision as follows. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion at the trial is not significantly different from the argument at the court of first instance, and even after examining the evidence submitted at the court of first instance, the first instance, which rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, is justifiable. In the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, “Evidence No. 14, 16, and 17” in the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, “Evidence No. 14 through 17” is deemed as “Evidence No. 14 through 17” in the fourth instance judgment of the court of first instance.

In the 5th sentence of the first instance court, the "resolution" in the 4th sentence in the first box shall be raised as "matters to be decided".

"The overall management of computers" in column 2 of Schedule 12 of the first instance judgment shall be added to "the management of computers and offices".

Part 1 of the first instance judgment, "No. 17 October 2018, 201," shall be deleted from Part 1 of the first instance judgment.

Each "this Court" in the first instance court's 14th trial's 16th trial's 17th trial and 17th trial's - "Seoul Administrative Court".

Part 15 of the judgment of the first instance court was "(3) the plaintiff did not comply with the above order of remedy, and the Gyeonggi Regional Labor Relations Commission decided on March 2017."

In March 8, 2015, the first instance court's decision "as of March 8, 2015" in the 15th sentence of the 14th instance court shall be "as of March 8, 2016."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.