A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 12, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million with a fine of KRW 1 million at the Seoul Western District Court on April 12, 2007, and on September 10, 2007, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million with a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on September 10, 2007, and on February 20, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on February 20, 2008, and on May 12, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 million with a total of 4 times the criminal power of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving on drinking) by committing a violation of the Road Traffic

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving automobiles Bk5

On April 7, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol at around 20:35, while making it difficult to drive the car normally, and led to the two-lane road in front of the Yansan-gu, Seosan-gu, Annsan-si, to proceed from the girth of the girth of the plant source to D.

At the time, in such a case, a driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering room and the left and right, and by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent by neglecting the above duty of care in a state where normal operation is difficult, such as being able to operate the steering gear and operating the steering system as intended, and by neglecting the above duty of care, and driving it as is. The Defendant was able to receive the back part of the victim E (E, South, 49 years old) driving where the Defendant was stopping for signal traffic at the front section of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to such occupational negligence.

2...