logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단3685
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won in the Seoul Southern District Court in Seoul Southern District Court on February 21, 201, a fine of five million won in the Seoul East District Court on September 2, 2011, and a fine of six million won in the Daejeon District Court on June 15, 201, due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking), etc. on September 2, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of six million won in the Daejeon District Court on June 15, 2015.

1. On July 16, 2016, the Defendant was driving a clater vehicle in the section of about 2 km from the penta to the front day of the “Dan Spanish-dong,” where it is impossible to identify the name of the clater in the Jeju city in the state of alcohol content 0.086% under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license on July 16, 2016.

Therefore, even though the defendant had driven a drinking motor vehicle at least twice, he/she again driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and on the same ground as Paragraph 1, the Defendant was subject to control from a slope E belonging to the Jeju East Police Station D District Team.

The defendant was memorying to present his resident registration numbers to identify his identity by E.

F's resident registration number (G) was notified and used unlawfully by another person.

3. The Defendant forged a private document on the same date and time as paragraph 1, at a place as that of paragraph 1, and on the same grounds as Paragraph 1, was subject to control from the slope E belonging to the Jeju Dong Police Station D District, the Defendant entered the “F” in the driver’s name column by using a black pen in the state of the driver’s circumstantial statement report, and signed on the name of the driver.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the F’s private document under the name of F on proof of fact among one copy of the circumstantial statement report on the driver in charge.

4. The Defendant’s exercise of the above investigation document is the date and time set forth in paragraph 1.

arrow