1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant committed the instant lawsuit against the Plaintiff A and C on December 1, 2005, and against the Plaintiff B on March 1, 2012.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 2005, the Defendant: (a) deemed that all of the Plaintiffs were a notary public’s representatives of the Dhap Law Office (hereinafter “instant workplace”); and (b) on March 1, 2012, issued a disposition to recognize the Plaintiff’s eligibility as an individual workplace health insurance policyholder with respect to Plaintiff A and C; and (c) as to Plaintiff B on March 1, 2012.

B. On June 20, 2014, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the total remuneration amounting to KRW 40,645,974 for each year of 2013 and the total remuneration amounting to KRW 41,877,670 for each year of 2013 for Plaintiff A and C with respect to the income accrued from the instant place of business, and the Defendant issued a disposition imposing KRW 3,961,420 for each of the instant settlement insurance premium amounting to KRW 1,282,680 for Plaintiff A and C with respect to the instant place of business on July 21, 2014 (hereinafter “disposition imposing the instant settlement insurance premium”).

C. On August 8, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed an objection with the Health Insurance Objection Committee against the imposition of the instant insurance premium, but the Health Insurance Objection Committee dismissed the objection on October 13, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 10, 12, 13 and 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to Article 20(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act ex officio determination on the legality of a claim for revocation of recognition of an individual, workplace, health insurance policyholder against the Plaintiffs among the instant lawsuit, a lawsuit seeking revocation of an administrative disposition shall be filed within one year from the date of such disposition, etc., unless there is a justifiable reason

However, on December 1, 2005, the defendant issued a disposition to recognize the insured status of each individual workplace health insurance policyholder against the plaintiff A and C on March 1, 2012, and against the plaintiff B on March 1, 2012. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in this case seeking revocation of the above disposition at the latest after November 5, 2014, which has passed one year since the above disposition was issued by the plaintiffs. It is recognized that the plaintiffs have justifiable reasons for failing to observe the filing period.