Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, only 10 days shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2018, around 16:15, the Defendant: (a) at the E-care center in the operation of the victim’s apartment B apartment No. Da in the Gyeongcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, the Defendant: (b) sound the victim’s “Woo in accordance with the sound of sp and this year” on the ground that the victim had a good talk about the Defendant’s children at the parents’ collective hostinging room; and (c) “Woo turn back outside the width.”

10 10 10

(b) Domination;

E. G Child-care centers closed in the same way as the G Child-care center could not be seen as such, which interfere with the victim’s operation of child-care centers by way of avoiding 25 minutes of disturbance, such as threatening the victim by speaking, threatening the victim, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. Each witness statement of I and J [the consistent police and court statement of D and H, the statement of the witness statement of I and J are consistent with the facts charged in this case, consistent with each of the facts charged in this case, and the statement of D and H are written in detail at the time of citing the Defendant’s oral statement, etc. The Defendant filed a civil petition against the child house after the instant case, and the Defendant filed a civil petition against the child house, and the Defendant’s civil petition of this case and the Defendant’s civil petition system reduces 1/3 of the original birth, and H only takes care of the infant care teacher due to psychological disorder, can be found guilty of the facts charged in the instant case]. The application of the law can be found as

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not consistent, consistent, and inconsistent with the reasoning that it is difficult for the defendant to understand, and the victim has caused many difficulties to the defendant, such as the reduction of 1/3 of the original life by the civil petition system of the case and the defendant, and appeals against the defendant, and H has only taken a 6-year infant care teacher due to the psychological disorder caused by the crime of this case.