The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s argument PJ (hereinafter “instant clan”) title trust with 1/3 shares of Q, R, and S, each of which belongs to the instant land owned by the Plaintiff. A resolution was made to terminate the title trust of the said title holder and re-title trust to the Plaintiff on April 29, 2018 at the extraordinary general meeting of the Plaintiff and the officers’ meeting of August 26, 2018. Since the said title holder died and the Defendants succeeded to the property before they transferred, the Defendants are obliged to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of termination of title trust with respect to the inheritance shares among the instant land.

2. The judgment of the court below, as alleged by the plaintiff, held that the clan of this case legitimately trusted the land of this case to Q, R, and S, and then the plaintiff passed a resolution to cancel the above title trust agreement and to re-title trust the shares to the plaintiff, the plaintiff did not have any ground for direct obtaining of the plaintiff's right to claim the transfer registration of ownership against the defendants ( even if the plaintiff acted in subrogation of the clan of this case, the plaintiff may claim the transfer registration of ownership against the defendants in the future of the clan of this case, but there is no legal ground for claiming the transfer registration of ownership to the plaintiff without omitting the clan of this case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 66Da892, Jul. 26, 196). The same applies even if considering that the clan of this case has a limit to acquiring farmland under the Farmland Act, the plaintiff's assertion is

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as there is no ground. It is so decided as per Disposition.