A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From June 19, 2017, the Defendant is a public duty personnel who is performing duties, such as parking management, at a regular Eup tax office C.

No public duty personnel shall leave his place of service or fail to serve in the relevant field for at least eight days in total without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: January 26, 2018; January 26, 2018; January 29; and the same year.

2. Before February 1, 1, around April 6, 2018, from around April 2, 2018 to March 3 of the same month, 2, from around April 12, 2018, 6 days from around April 18, 2018 to around April 25, 2018, and from around April 26, 2018 to May 11, 201, the said regularly Eup/Myeon did not work in the said Eup/Myeon office for 24 days including 11 days.

As a result, the defendant left his service for at least eight days in total without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written charge of a comprehensive investigation report on the defendant's legal statement and investigation report (whether the defendant has any justifiable reason to leave from office without permission);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the police against the defendant or D (two-time replacement);

1. Application of statutes to a copy of a list of service status A;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 89-2 of the Military Service Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and the crime of this case is not shorter than the period of absence without permission, and the public official in charge did not comply with the sick leave and the instructions to work, and was absent without contact, and there was no hospital medical records during the absence period. There was no hospital medical records during the absence period. The hospital’s medical records received the hospital’s medical records were provided at a clinic with “hump, sale, and chump, and tension” or “hump, sale, sale, and sale of a shoulder.” The hospital’s medical records were provided at a clinic with “hump, sale, sale, sale, and salechine” or “humd sale, sale, and salechine of a family department,” and received a hospital’s external medical records from a hospital of this case.