Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:0, the Defendant: (b) around 00:0, the “D main points” operated by the Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu Victim C (hereinafter referred to as the “C”), and (c) whether the Defendant was able to obtain double payment in the calculation process, which was first and remaining at the same time, to the victim during the period of calculation.

“Abruting,” referring to “the Defendant,” and referring to other customers, referring to “the victim’s drinking business by force,” which interfered with the victim’s drinking business by force, such as: “Abrut”, “abbb, fluent, and fluort”, re-incing into the bar, and gathering the table, fluort, and fluencing the fee to other customers inside the drinking house.

2. On May 3, 2016, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim E by a private person at the bar specified in paragraph (1) at around 00:15, who was reported by the said C; (b) expressed the victim E with a large voice in front of the said C and the customer; and (c) demanded the victim to take the bath; (d) on the other hand, the Defendant continued to demand that the victim take the bath.

"Publicly insulting the victim by referring to the expression "...."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements of victims and witnesses);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 170 million won;

2. The fact that there are several records of punishment for the crime of final and conclusive violence is disadvantageous.

On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as the agreement with the victim of interference with business, the time of interference with business is not long, and it is against contingent crimes.