logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.07.18 2018가단103515
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff KRW 56,134,83 and KRW 55,229,551 among them, from March 14, 2013 to July 3, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “D”).

(C) On March 23, 2012, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to provide a credit guarantee with respect to the obligation to repay the principal and interest of loan to be borne by receiving the loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of KRW 59,50,000, the Plaintiff issued the following credit guarantee form D. At the time of the credit guarantee agreement of this case, at the time of the credit guarantee agreement of March 23, 2012, A agreed to pay all incidental obligations, such as the amount paid by the Plaintiff by subrogation and the expenses incurred in the execution, exercise, and legal procedure of the loan of the loan of KRW 59,50,000, the amount of the loan of the National Housing Fund of KRW 53,550,000, the guarantee period of the loan of the National Housing Fund of KRW 53,500,000, March 23, 2012.

B. Although Defendant A conspired to engage in “F”, the Defendants made false re-issuance certificates, false benefit passbook, and four insurance coverage certificates as if Defendant A had worked normally in “F,” and Defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the lessor of the said last instance, even though Defendant A had no intent to reside in the H of the Daegu-gu G Building, Daegu-gu.

C. After that, on March 23, 2012 after Defendant A transferred his resident registration to the above address, Defendant A applied for a loan of KRW 59,50,000 won for the Workers’ Lease Deposit Fund by submitting a false certificate of resignation, false benefit passbook, four-party insurance policy certificate, lease contract, and resident registration record card transferred to the above address as if he had worked normally in F at the D namedong Branch. D from the Plaintiff.

On the same day, Defendant A paid the above KRW 59.5 million on the same day with a credit guarantee certificate as described in the paragraph.

Defendant A terminated the above lease contract immediately and used KRW 50,50,000 as the above lease fund with the remaining Defendants.

The defendant A is a natural body with respect to the above agreement.

arrow