1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 18, 2019 to December 4, 2020, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 23, 1971, the Plaintiff reported the marriage with C on March 23, 1971 and is between C and C.

B. From April 2019 to September 2019, the Defendant sent to C several times with sexual intercourses with C, and had sexual intercourses.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry and video of Gap evidence 1 to 12, witness C's partial testimony, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Defendant, who is liable for damages, committed an unlawful act with C, who is the spouse of the Plaintiff, thereby infringing upon the Plaintiff’s communal living or interfering with their maintenance, and infringing on the Plaintiff’s right as the spouse of the Plaintiff.

[Witness Witness C testified that a sexual relationship with the Defendant was established with C; the Defendant did not deny the Defendant’s phone call at any time when or when the date on which C entered into the “related relationship”; and asked C to talk about how it should be done in the future; and the Defendant’s phone call at the same time that “the same person who does so as to do so as to do so by a serious and alternative female organ” should not be first judged and known to C; “Irre the same person who does so by a serious and alternative female organ,” “Irre that he does not want to do so.” In light of the fact that the Defendant divided a conversation based on the premise that C had a sexual relationship with C, such as “Irre that he does not want to do so,” and “Irre that he does not want to do so,” it can be sufficiently recognized that the Plaintiff suffered mental pain by the empirical rule.”

The defendant is obligated to pay consolation money to the plaintiff as compensation for mental damage.

B. Various circumstances revealed from the facts acknowledged by the evidence revealed earlier within the scope of liability for damages, namely, the marriage period of the Plaintiff and C, the marital relationship, the family relationship, the content and degree of fraudulent act, and the following facts.