logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.09.04 2019가단22246
건물명도등
Text

Defendant:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) 15,400,000 won and October 25, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are co-owners of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. On February 25, 2018, the Defendant leased the instant real estate from the Plaintiffs (i.e., KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 2,200,000 (value-added tax separate, prepaid) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); and the Defendant did not pay the lease deposit to the Plaintiffs, but did not pay a monthly rent from April 2019.

C. The Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the instant lease contract was terminated as the Defendant’s nonperformance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs, and pay the amount of KRW 2,200,000 per month for seven months from April 2019 to October 2019 (=2,200,000 x seven months) and the amount of money equivalent to the rent from October 25, 2019 to October 25, 200.

3. The plaintiffs' claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow