logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.06 2018가합583300
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendants delivered the part of the defendants' possession among the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”) approved by the head of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 10, 2012 pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; hereinafter “former Urban Improvement Act”) to implement a reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

B. On July 29, 2013, the head of Seocho-gu approved the project implementation plan for the instant reconstruction project, and on July 13, 2016, approved the management and disposal plan and announced it on July 14, 2016.

C. The real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is located within the said project implementation district, and the Defendants occupy the instant real estate as a lessee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Article 49(6) of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas provides that when an approval of the management and disposal plan is publicly notified, holders such as owners, superficies, persons holding superficies, leasers, etc. of the previous land or buildings shall not use or benefit from the previous land or buildings until the date of public announcement of the transfer under Article 54.

As seen above, since the approval of the management and disposal plan for the instant reconstruction project was publicly announced, the Plaintiff, the project implementer, may proceed with the project by removing buildings in the rearrangement zone, etc., and for this purpose, the right holder of the land or structure shall transfer the land or structure under his/her possession to the project implementer.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendants’ assertion as to the Defendants’ assertion is ① Article 81 of the Urban Improvement Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017 and enforced from February 9, 2018).

arrow