1. Defendant A

A. Of the first judgment, the guilty part against Defendant A and the third judgment shall be reversed, respectively.

(b).

1. Of the facts charged against Defendant A, the name of the first instance court subject to the adjudication of this Court refers to the name of the victim by the sequence Nos. 168 to 173 (K) and the number Nos. 168 to 173 (K) from among the facts charged against Defendant A.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The Court acquitted each fraud described in 174 to 187 (L), 234 (D).

The prosecutor did not appeal as to the above part.

Therefore, the above part of the first judgment is separated and finalized as it is and excluded from the object of adjudication by this Court.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the first and the third first instances of Defendant A to Defendant A (the imprisonment of two years and six months with prison labor of the first instance court and the third instance court) is too unreasonable.

Defendant

A, in the statement of grounds of appeal on the judgment of the third court, argued for misunderstanding of facts on the third trial date of this court.

B. The punishment sentenced by Defendant B to Defendant B (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of social service, 120 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

C. The sentence imposed on Defendant E (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service) by Defendant E is too unreasonable.

Defendant

F The sentence sentenced by the first instance court to Defendant F (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 120 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

E. The punishment sentenced by Defendant H to Defendant H (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of social service work, 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

F. Prosecutor 1) The sentence imposed by the first instance court on Defendant A (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unfluened and unreasonable.2) The first instance court sentenced Defendant B, F, and G to Defendant B, G (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of community service, and one hundred and twenty hours of imprisonment) is too unfluent and unfair.

3) The sentence imposed by the first instance court on Defendant C (one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service) is too unfased and unreasonable.