logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.03 2013누29195
재결취소 및 보상금
Text

1. Of the ancillary claims in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amounts are equivalent to the money ordered to be paid.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the relevant laws and regulations are as follows: (a) the “authorized Evaluation Corporation” under the 3th 18th 18th 1st of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as the “Appraisal Corporation”; and (b) the 4th 1st 1st son’s “deposit” shall be deemed as the “deposit,” and (c) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. Whether to compensate for remaining land;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff used the instant land as a group of land for the cultivation of the instant land along with the land to be expropriated. As a result of the urban planning project, some of the land to be expropriated is expropriated, and the value of the instant farmland has decreased, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 89,891,70 based on the appraisal by the appraiser M of the instant court, as compensation, pursuant to Articles 73 and 79 of the Act.

B. According to Article 73 of the Act and Article 32(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, if the price of the remaining land is reduced due to the acquisition of part of a group of land belonging to the same landowner, the project operator refers to the price before the change is made in the price of the remaining land prior to the transfer to the zone where the public works are performed (where the price of the remaining land is changed due to the

(ii) the amount of loss to be compensated for after incorporation into a public works project implementation zone shall be calculated by subtracting the price of the remaining land after incorporation into the project implementation zone. In such cases, the loss to be compensated shall be incurred not only due to the change in the price formation factors such as the conditions of the catch or the conditions of access due to the acquisition or use of part of the land, but also due to the type, structure, use of the facilities installed by the implementation of the project for the purpose of acquisition or use, and the possibility of future use other than the change

arrow