logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.09.07 2017고정131
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as a professor of the chemical engineering and professors of the Korea National University, performed two research and development services, including “E” from May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2015.

According to the regulations on the management, etc. of research and development projects, the Regulations on Research Expenses for D University, and the guidelines on the management of research expenses for D University, the victim D University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation (hereinafter “Industrial Cooperative Foundation”) shall be managed by being entrusted with the conclusion of the industry-academic cooperation agreement with each ordering agency, such as government departments, and the execution of research expenses. If a person in charge of research requests payment of expenses, such as personnel expenses, along with evidentiary documents, the project funds shall be executed. If there is a balance or an amount spent unfairly, the funds shall be collected and returned to each ordering agency. In particular, in the case of personnel expenses to be paid to a participating researcher, the Institute of Industry-Academic Cooperation for D University, which is a person in charge of research, shall comply with the relevant tax laws and shall be directly paid to the participating financial institution’s account at the request of the relevant professor. In order to protect personal information and ensure transparency in the management of research expenses, a person in charge of research, such as entrusting the account of the participating research

On May 2012, the Defendant: (a) performed research and development services and paid to the Institute on personnel expenses; (b) cannot receive a refund from the said Institute on the pretext of joint management; and (c) did not receive a refund from the said Institute on the pretext of joint management; and (d) did not use it individually; (b) filed a claim for excess of the amount actually paid for the Institute’s personnel expenses; and (c) received the difference from the said Institute to the account in

On May 14, 2012, the Defendant ordered the Korean Research Foundation to the staff in charge at the victim industry-academic cooperation department office located in Ansan-si F.

arrow