Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 20, 2010, the Defendant: (a) leased 102 building 1,000,000,0000,000 monthly rent and 2,60,000,000 from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F commercial building owned by the Defendant; (b) but (c) the Defendant was operating a business for the sales of liquid rent from July 201 to July 201.

On August 11, 2011, the Defendant notified E of the termination of a lease agreement due to the overdue overdue delay, and around October 15, 201 of the same year, the Defendant agreed to transfer the right of lease under the above 102 on the condition that he would receive KRW 25 million as a broker of G, a real estate brokerage assistant, and received KRW 5 million first of all.

E entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant as a broker around October 18 of the same year with the content of succeeding to the lease contract. However, upon receiving a claim from another lessee who operates beauty rooms in the building, E returned 8 million won, which is a down payment, to H around November 9 of the same year and terminated the lease agreement.

On November 12, 199, the Defendant, at the time of the withdrawal from the above 102 on November 14, 1999, claimed that 30,646,060 won should be paid, but 40,000,000 won should not be paid due to the absence of overdue rent, etc., after deducting the rent and management expenses in arrears from E from the above 102 on the same year. On November 15, 199, the Defendant filed a lawsuit to claim the return of the lease deposit, etc. to pay 63,653,940 won, such as the damages not paid the lease deposit and the premium.

around May 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to the Seoul Central District Court’s dismissal ruling on the ground that “E deposited the above KRW 30,546,060 (However, a deduction of KRW 100,000 for waste disposal costs) around November 18, 201, and there was no obligation to compensate for any damages equivalent to the premium,” and that the Defendant was dismissed on or around October 18, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant appealed against the above appellate judgment, and tried to create favorable evidence by filing a false accusation against G and E, which testified in the above lawsuit, with perjury, etc.