The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is a person charged with planning, designing, designing, authorizing, and supervising construction of a new warehouse and research institute in H, a corporation contracted by the FF Co., Ltd. (representative G) that came into effect in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do from June 2009 to May 2010.

After the completion of the construction project, the Defendant was unable to pass the approval inspection of the use as design omission and building-to-land ratio design from Gwangju viewing, and as a result, the place to enforce liability such as compensation for damages from the owner, the Defendant was willing to testify as if G had voluntarily executed construction.

A. On September 29, 201, 201, Sung-nam Assistance 2010, combined 12131, the written indictment for perjury related to the instant case contains the facts charged that the Defendant’s questioning of the Defendant’s agent, “No. 17-1 and No. 3 are the original design drawings, and the evidence No. 17-2 and No. 4 are required to be prepared by the drawing that the Plaintiff had executed a change at will.” However, the prosecutor withdrawn the said facts charged as a modification of the indictment on January 27, 2015.

On September 29, 2011, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the construction work cost case No. 12131, and testified as follows, in the Suwon District Court 4, Sungwon-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong.

The Defendant responded to the question of the Defendant’s agent, “Is the Plaintiff (G) arbitrarily reduced the stairs of the part indicated in the drawing, and the retaining wall was constructed at a lower than 60cm than that of the drawing, so Is the Plaintiff’s agent’s arbitrarily changed construction.” The Defendant’s answer to the question of the Plaintiff’s agent, “Is to purchase this land to check this additional purchase,” and “Is to purchase the land to use the land as a whole and a site adjacent to the land.” However, Is to the fact that Is the building owner purchased the additional land to use it as a whole.

I think.