The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The 8-month imprisonment sentenced by the court below is too large and unfair.

2. The facts that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and reflected the mistake are favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant, who had the records of criminal punishment several times due to the same crime of interference with business, including four times of punishment, committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she had been serving as a repeated offender due to the same crime of interference with business, and the Defendant did not receive an application from the victim up to the trial. There is no special change in circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court after the sentence was rendered, and in consideration of the Defendant’s age, occupation, occupation, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.