logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.23 2017나458
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

Reasons

1. The defendant's appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence presented in the court of first instance is added to the evidence presented in

Therefore, the reasoning of this court’s judgment is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for deletion of “disposition 18” of the second instance judgment. Thus, this court’s judgment is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all the defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow