logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.03 2014가합558917
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. After the first decision on urban planning facilities (parks) was made in accordance with the Joseon General Notice No. 208 ( March 12, 1940), with respect to the Park Creation Project in Seodaemun-gu 118, Seodaemun-gu, Seohee-dong, the alteration of urban planning facilities (parks) was decided and announced on May 18, 2006 by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Public Notice No. 2006-184, and the implementation plan was authorized on November 23, 2006 by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Public Notice No. 2006-102 (hereinafter “the project”).

In accordance with the authorization of the above implementation plan, the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government became the project implementer of the project of this case, and the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government implemented the project as delegated by

B. On July 11, 2006, the Plaintiff purchased the purchase price of KRW 230,000,000 from the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment No. 503 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) located in the instant business zone.

C. On June 22, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a public site acquisition consultation agreement with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor and the instant apartment to be incorporated into the instant apartment. The Plaintiff was paid KRW 111,631,340 as compensation for the instant apartment by the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City (amended by Seoul Special Rules No. 3616, Apr. 10, 2008) has been amended by the Seoul Special Rules No. 3616, Apr. 10, 2008 to those who responded to the consultation compensation for their removal of land or buildings in the process of the project

The main contents are as shown in the attached Form.

hereinafter referred to as “the instant special supply rules”

Pursuant to the foregoing, Defendant SP intended to specially supply the national housing supplied by Defendant SP, and the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government notified the Plaintiff that it is eligible for the sale of the special housing units. E. The Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment unit selling the housing units in the new zone in the new zone in the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the instant apartment unit”).

arrow