logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고합369
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인위계등간음)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. around June 1, 2013, the Defendant called the victim D (Woo, 41 years of age, 3 years of delay disability, hereinafter “victim”) from the defendant’s home located in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area, called “I am off” and called “I am away from the body of the victim,” and called “I am away from the body of the victim,” and called “I am off the body of the victim, I am away from the body of the victim,” and inserted I am back to the body of the victim’s sexual organ one time in order for the victim to have sexual intercourse with the disabled.”

2. around January 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the disabled victim, who was a disabled person, by talking the victim’s chest, etc. by hand from a small side of the victim’s home located in Gwangju Nam-gu E.

3. On September 26, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim, who was disabled, by making the victim’s chest only once by hand from Gwangju Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force.

4. On September 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) refused to “Ginn't Iam?” before the “Ginn't go?”; and (b) again, the victim referred to as “Iam Iam?” as “Iam?” was placed in Ginn's guest room by inserting his sexual organ one time into the victim’s sound room; and (c) had sexual intercourse with the disabled victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

Each fact in the judgment

1. The defendant and his defense counsel, who stated that D’s testimony fit for this court, alleged that there was no sexual intercourse with the victim or indecent act against the victim at each time and place set forth in the judgment. However, according to evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant called the victim’s house at the victim’s house around June 2013 and called the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the victim’s house.

arrow