logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017나7153
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. In light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff supplied construction materials equivalent to KRW 67,864,620 (hereinafter “instant goods”) to the Defendant from March 14, 2016 to August 8, 2016, and received total of KRW 64,540,420 from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant goods”) upon examining the determination as to the cause of the claim (the Defendant asserted that the price of the instant goods cannot be recognized under the transaction list prepared by the Plaintiff by unilaterally raising the price without consultation with the Defendant. However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the overall purport of the evidence and arguments, the Plaintiff and the Defendant appears to have agreed on the transaction list prepared by the Plaintiff through e-mail or facsimile and agreed on the price of the instant goods, the Plaintiff’s obligation to deliver the instant goods to the Defendant at a rate of KRW 36,466,460,420 from the day following the day on which the Plaintiff supplied the instant goods to the Defendant by 306,4666,4666,2065.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow