logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.11.28 2014고단470
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 18, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant of "2014 Highest 470" was a person who sent the victim C (V, 39 years of age) at the Internet hosting site on March 2013.

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in the D apartment in the Gunsan-si, called “on the part of the Defendant,” saying, “on the part of the Defendant, he would repay money without delay, because he was able to use the money with money, as he was going to go to the Switzerland.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property or income at the time, and did not think of it with the victim, and did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim because the Defendant borrowed money from E, F, G to use the money for gambling, and thus was liable to pay more than KRW 200 million.

The Defendant received KRW 1.4 million from the victim’s agricultural bank account (H) on the same day and received KRW 86,221,000 from the victim over 56 times from around that time to August 4, 2013, as indicated in the attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby deceiving 86,221,00 won.

"2014 Highest 1120" Defendant became aware of victim I around 2011.

On June 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in the residence of the victims of the JJ in Busan-gu, Seoul-si, Seoul-si on June 15, 2012; (b) notwithstanding that the facts were to be used in gambling rather than in repaying the bonds even if it was borrowed from the victims; (c) the Defendant’s false statement that “the funds for bonds are insufficient; (d) immediately lending the bonds; and (e) was remitted from the victims to the account of the former bank in the name of the Defendant; and (e) was remitted five million won from that date to August 27, 2012 from that date.”

arrow