(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.10.26 2015나1734 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.10.26 2015나1734

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Text 1-A of the judgment of the first instance; and

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the "Consolidated Constitution" of the first instance court No. 8, 16, 8, 18, 9, 10, 9, 10, 10, 28, 28, 28, 200, 200, 200, 200, 30,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,

2.A change or addition shall be made to the following changes in the part in paragraph 6(a) of the judgment of the court of first instance not more than six(6).

“The Defendant, on October 8, 2013 at the second date for pleading of the first instance trial, indicated the preparatory documents on October 8, 2013, and affixed the “recognition of the fact of the recognition and the denial of the seal affixed,” but on August 18, 2015, stated the preparatory documents on the first date for pleading of the first instance trial, thereby denying the establishment of the said attached documents, while changing the said attached opinions to “the denial of the personal seal.”

However, confession as to the formation of a document is a confession as to the facts of assistance, but the revocation of a confession as to the facts of assistance should be treated the same as the withdrawal of a confession as to the facts of major facts, unlike the withdrawal of a confession as to other indirect facts, so the party who recognized the authenticity of the document cannot freely withdraw it, and this is also the same in the case where the document was withdrawn later. The same applies to the case where the defendant acknowledged the authenticity of the seal affixed on the date of the second pleading of the court of first instance, and there is no evidence to recognize that the opinion on the recognition of the portion of the seal affixed on

Therefore, it is presumed that the defendant's seal affixed to the above document is affixed with the seal of the defendant, and the authenticity of the whole document is presumed to be established.

"At the 8th decision of the first instance court, the following is added.

“F.”.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2014.08.22 2013나27055

-광주고등법원(전주) 2020.07.09 2019나11314

-서울고등법원 2015.05.29 2014나33002

-대법원 1988. 12. 20. 선고 88다카3083 판결

-전주지방법원 2019.05.30 2018나9121