logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.29 2013가단123
물품대금
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant C, as to KRW 26,813,950, Defendant C, as well as each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale, etc. of the CC Processing Machinery with safety time D as its place of business. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company that engages in the manufacture and sale of general machinery and parts related to machinery and equipment, and both Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) operates E.

B. On June 201, the Plaintiff registered the same parcel number as the location of Defendant B’s workplace as F as the trade name at the place of business.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence 19, witness G's witness G's testimony, the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination

A. In fact, H, the Plaintiff’s husband, became aware of E while engaging in the work related to the manufacture and sale of co-mechanics. On January 201, 201, H substantially operated Co., Ltd. I and supplied Co., Ltd. parts of co-mechanics to Defendant B. 2) upon the Plaintiff’s recommendation from April 201 to June 201, H received KRW 3 million per month from May 201 to June 201 as the basic living cost.

3) Even after J commenced from May 201, 201, Defendant B supplied parts of the machinery machinery from Defendant B to May 201, and from June 201, the Plaintiff (F) supplied parts of the machinery machinery. Defendant C was supplied by Plaintiff (F) around March 2012. Meanwhile, Plaintiff (F) supplied parts of the machinery machinery to the Defendants, and filed a claim for payment with G who is an accounting employee, along with the transaction specifications or the delivery specifications, the payment was completed by way of documentizing the details and reporting the content to E or the E’s wife managing the corporate account passbook of the Defendants to the Plaintiff (F)’s account.

5) Around the end of June 2012, E raises a problem that E and J.

arrow