A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to one year and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Jung-gu District Court on February 1, 2008, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 24, 2008, and on October 15, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of suspended execution to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on October 23, 2008.

1. On July 6, 2007, around July 2007, the Defendant made the Defendant make a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay 10-20% interest to the Defendant if he/she invested KRW 10 million to the victim,” by delivering it to the Schlage operated by the victim D in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and let the Defendant F, who was known to the victim with the victim, engage in trade with the victim.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return 10-20% of interest, even if he received money from the victim as investment money because he did not engage in trade transactions with Mongolia.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, led F to deceiving the victim, thereby allowing F to deposit KRW 10 million with the national bank account in the name of F in the name of investment from the victim, and then acquired it from F.

2. On August 22, 2007, around August 22, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would return the principal to October 10, 2007, the payment of interest would be 10-20% if the Defendant made any more investment in the money because he/she exported the money to the monet.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant did not export the steel scrap and received money under the name of investment money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to return the money by adding the interest of 10-20% until October 10, 2007.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is a single bank under the name of the defendant for the purpose of investment from the victim.