Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a “B” or a customer, and is a victim C (54 tax) letter or manager.

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 8, 2017, from around 02:50 to around 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim C(54 tax) who was under influence of the Defendant on the “B” Manyang-gu D Donyang-gu D Donyang-gu Donyang-si, and thus, rejected the Defendant’s position on the “B” Mandong-B; and (b) prevented the Defendant from being exposed to the Defendant on the part of his employee E, by putting the Defendant at the large interest of the C(54 tax) of the C’s Mandong-gu Mandong-gu Mandong-gu.

B. On May 8, 2017, from around 05:50 to 06:30 on the same day, the Defendant visited the places indicated in the above paragraph (a) at the same port to take a bath for the large interest by avoiding disturbance, thereby interfering with the victim’s friendship and duties.

2. The Defendant’s insult No. 1-A. at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1-A. In the presence of the business owner C, employees E, or 119 emergency medical service crew members, and dispatched the 112 reported call to the victim F (38 taxes) of the victim police officer called “satisfe,” and said f (38 taxes).

Hadar,

The victim publicly insultingd the victim at a large interest rate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report (to apply the Acts and subordinate statutes to B privacy or CCTV analysis and investigation);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant interferes with duties by avoiding disturbance in the above friendship while drinking alcohol, and the nature and circumstance of the offense of insult against the police officer dispatched to the site is not less severe in light of the contents and circumstances of the offense. The victim of the insult wants the punishment of the defendant, and is punished as violent crimes.