logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.02.06 2016고정272
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a real estate brokerage assistant, and the victim C and approximately one-year music club members are aware of about one year.

Although the victim asked the defendant to buy a "D" ran bar, the defendant was aware that he/she entered into a sales contract with the E in direct trade through the branch, thereby being aware that he/she would avoid the payment of brokerage fees.

On August 31, 2015, the Defendant, at “D” Dondong F, located in Busan Nam-gu, Busan on August 22, 2015, shall be discarded off to the Defendant’s “D” Dondong-gu, Mandong-gu, Seoul.

Before that, there is a brush 2,00,000 won, which has been abandoned by the brush, and the brush is discarded and the funeral is prohibited.

“Ch. H. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. and C. C. C. C.

D. The victim was threatened by the end of the night road."

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and pursuant to Article 283(3) of the same Act, the case cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent. According to the witness C’s legal statement, the victim C can be acknowledged as having withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on January 12, 2017, which was after the prosecution of the instant case. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow