beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant Company B (hereinafter “B”) operated by the Defendant refers to an advertising contract agency that concludes an advertising contract with an advertiser and connects it to the advertising agency, etc. The victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) enters into an advertising contract with the advertising agency, such as D (E) and then receives a request for transmission from the advertising contract agency, such as the above B, etc., after entering into an advertising contract with the advertising agency, and then transmitting the advertisement to the said medium.
On September 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the damaged company’s office located in the heading of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building G, said Defendant would engage in an “acting for advertising contracts” to the representative of the victimized company.
At the time of being entrusted with the advertising contract agency, 65% of the remainder, excluding 35% of the fee, out of the amount contracted with the advertiser, will be deposited in advance as the advertising price.
There are many customers about advertisement sales.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the Defendant had been urged to pay KRW 120 million to “I”, an advertising agency, which had been engaged in transactions prior to that time, as the transaction was terminated on July 2015, and around that time, the Defendant had been urged to pay the above “I” and the above amount to “I” by preparing a fair certificate of fairness. In addition, the Defendant had a debt of KRW 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in total sales revenue for the year 2015 after its establishment and around August 2014, while the Defendant continued to pay more than the company’s interest, and there was no intent or ability to pay the amount to the company as the employee’s benefits, personal debt, etc., even if having received money from the advertiser, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount to pay.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the above H, the representative of the victimized company, thereby causing damage.