A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 19, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) from the Gwangju District Court’s branch on November 19, 2015, and KRW 6 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the same support on September 9, 2016, respectively.

[2] On August 24, 2016, at around 17:00, the Defendant driven B C’s vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.276% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the salt farm, which is located in the high pressure Eup of the pressure of the newanan-gun, Nananan-gun, Nananan-gun, Nanan-gun, Nanan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan-gun, Nan

As a result, the Defendant was punished for not less than twice due to drinking, but was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement report on the situation of a driver who is placed in driving, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, ledger of driver's licenses, etc., and investigation report (Notification of revocation of driver's licenses

1. Records of judgment: Inquiry about criminal records, reporting on the results of confirmation of criminal records not yet taken, and applying Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the same type of force);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. In full view of all the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment twice due to driving of alcohol, such as the criminal records as indicated in the judgment, repeated driving of this case, and the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is 0.276% higher than that of the Defendant’s blood, the sentence is determined as per Disposition.