logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.07.20 2017노202
강제추행등
Text

Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the claimant for observation order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal on the part of the case by the defendant and the claimant for the observation order to protect the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is too unreasonable in light of the sentencing conditions of the case in light of various sentencing conditions in this case.

It is unfair that the court below ordered the defendant to disclose and notify the information about the defendant for a period of one year.

In light of the various sentencing conditions of the Prosecutor’s instant case, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

Judgment

Examining the various factors in the sentencing of the Defendant and the prosecutor’s argument on the crime of this case, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, who committed an indecent act by deceiving female victims’ her mare at the bus stops and damaged TV in the reverse waiting room. In light of the place, contents, methods, and relationship between the Defendant and the victim, etc. of the crime, the crime of this case is highly likely to be subject to criticism again during the process of being prosecuted and tried for the crime of indecent act of this case. In particular, the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victim of the crime of indecent act up to the trial, and the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment due to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual injury) on July 23, 2015, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on July 23, 2015 and committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and there was a large number of similar sexual crimes or property damage to the Defendant.

Meanwhile, the fact that the Defendant appears to recognize and reflect the instant crime; the gravity of force used in the event of a forced indecent act is not significant; the damage is relatively insignificant in the case of a property damage crime; the victim of the property damage agree with the victim; and the said victim does not want the punishment of the Defendant; and the instant crime appears to have been committed by contingency under the influence of alcohol.

arrow