1. Defendant Q Q and R jointly enter the Plaintiff in the “Plaintiff” column in the attached Form.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ contractual relationship 1) Defendant Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Q Q”)

(2) On August 18, 2014, the Plaintiff (Co., Ltd.) engaged in the filming business is a consulting business. The Plaintiff (Co., Ltd.) entered into an external production contract with Defendant Q Q with the view to taking charge of the production of lectures for the production of objects necessary for Defendant Q’s online business, such as photography, editing, co-marketing, delivery of completion copies, and storage of hard disks, and the Plaintiff entered into an external production contract with Defendant Q Q’s online business.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant manufacturing contract”). Article 4 (1) A producer shall provide the producer with a detailed statement of manufacture of the object from the first day of each month to the last day of the relevant month, and shall send a tax invoice to the requesting company by no later than the fifth day of the following month after verifying the requesting company, the detailed statement, and the settlement of expenses.

(2) The requester shall pay the tax invoice costs sent under paragraph (1) (i) by the 10th of the following month to the account of the manufacturer.

(3) The production of a lecture (shot/don/don/don/don/don/delivery) 16:00 of the unit price of manufacture-related affairs classified as the unit price of RT (AT Map 16:0 of the 40,000 unit price

1. Where a request for cancellation of a penalty (excluding VAT) due to a certain cancellation is made at the request of the requesting company: The amount of 20,000 won per hour.

2. Where photographs are not in progress due to a cause attributable to the manufacturer or an error occurs in the produced video works, the expenses for re-recording shall be free of charge;

3) Plaintiffs A and other Plaintiffs (hereinafter “Plaintiff B, etc.”)

A) The Plaintiff is an instructor. Around August 2014, Plaintiff B, etc. entered into a contract with Defendant Q for the operation of “Internet video lectures against public officials’ tests (hereinafter “instant business lectures”)” (hereinafter “instant lecture contract”).

In the instant lecture contract, Defendant Q made a video lecture to Plaintiff B, etc., and made a lecture fee for PTPP (PT) from the first day of each month.