The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (18 years of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the progress and cause of physical collision between the Defendant and the victims that did not resolve the noise dispute sleeply, and rather deepens, there are some parts that can be taken into account for the motive or reason for committing the instant crime. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a very rough and significant situation, and the Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime in a contingency, and is confessioned and against the instant crime from an investigation agency to a trial court, except for a long time fine not exceeding two times, there is no specific criminal power, and there is a family member to support the instant crime, such as a wife in a de facto marital relationship, and the victim’s E medical treatment decision was made in favor of the Defendant.

However, murder is a serious crime that is an absolute value that cannot be altered, and the result is very serious and there is no way to care for a dead life.

It is difficult to measure the physical and mental suffering of victims in the course of the crime of this case, where the victims died or suffered serious injuries, and physical and mental suffering is difficult.

Furthermore, in this case, the bereaved family members who lose the victim F appear to have suffered from an uncomfortable mental impulse, and especially the victim E was faced with the shock and slicking of the son who lost the son together with the pain caused by the wound.

Therefore, the bereaved family members and victims want to take severe punishment of the defendant several times up to the trial of the party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take any measure to thir the pain of the victim E and the bereaved family members.

In addition, the defendant has several objections.