A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant was notified of the termination of the management of security guards from the victim E (3) who is the head of the “D Security Enterprise” branch of the Defendant’s “D Security Enterprise” at the Namyang-si Office around 14:10 on August 28, 2017, and when the Defendant was informed of the termination of the management of security guards, the Defendant was faced with golf loans (92 cm in length) that are dangerous articles that he was being faced with the door of the D Security Enterprise. The Defendant was faced with the victim’s face due to the knife and knife of the victim’s head, arms, etc.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim about two weeks of medical treatment, including the inner part, the complete part, the complete part, the supervision, the complete part, etc. of the victim.

2. The injured Defendant thought that the dismissal of the Victim F (56) against the Defendant was due to the victim’s occurrence at the time, time, and place in paragraph 1, and when the victim’s face and body was taken by drinking and drinking.

As a result, the Defendant abused the victim, thereby leading the victim to a 2-day medical examination of the sin, 5 sins, sins, s insins, sins, and s insins.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. A victim's image photograph and golf shot photo;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of injury and choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was two or more victims, and the damage was not recovered. However, considering the fact that the Defendant’s mistake was against the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant’s work was lost, and the fact that the Defendant appears to have committed the crime due to the division of work, and that the Defendant had no criminal record.