logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.28 2019고단1299
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months, and for two years, respectively.

However, each of the three years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s name-free telephone financial fraud (sophishing “Sphishing”), its assistants, and its assistants’ name-free telephone financial fraud aid staff play a role of inducing unspecified victims to withdraw money from the financial account under the victim’s name by misrepresenting them to investigative agencies, such as inspection or prosecution investigators, etc., and posting a telephone at an irregular place. The Defendant, who is a staff member of the Financial Supervisory Service, assumes the victim’s personal identity, and wired cash from the victim to the total book.

On November 20, 2018, the Defendant forged official document documents, stating that “The Financial Supervisory Service intends to protect the financial assets of his account under the Financial Supervisory Service through D,” the Defendant used the conversation name of “C” in the Seoul Scscam located near the Scam Station. The Defendant sent a document file in the name of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, on which the official seal of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission is affixed, and then printed three copies of the document file using a local printer in accordance with the above name misstatement’s order.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged three documents in the name of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, a public document, for the purpose of uttering in collusion with name misjudgments, etc.

B. On November 26, 2018, at around 11:00, the telephone financial fraud assistance staff members on the display of forged public documents and the false statement of the name of fraud, following the above public offering, they told the victim E to post a telephone, and as if they were the employees belonging to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, that “In order to protect the current one’s own assets because the new name was stolen, and thus, the one would have withdrawn cash and delivered it to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.” The above victim would have the said victim withdraw KRW 8.5 million in cash on the same day, and enticed the victim to the G convenience store located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

Defendant continued to do so.

arrow