logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.16 2014나2037994
소유권이전등기말소 등
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. According to the land survey division in which the fact of recognition was made in the Japanese colonial period, such as the situation of the land and the relation of registration and registry, the fact of recognition is indicated as the situation that L(L) was received, and the address column is public column. G (the administrative district name was sold in the city of strike) G ① 757, ② 305 square meters (the land indicated in paragraph 4 of the attached Table); Presidential Decree No. 11757, Mar. 17, 2007>

The registration of preservation of ownership was completed due to the restoration of the deceased M’s name on October 22, 1953 with respect to the land of this case by the Jung-gu District Court, Yangyang-dong District Court, Goyang-si registry office, 114, 1953.

On August 1, 1961, the old land cadastre for the land of this case, which was restored on August 1, 1961, is described LW as follows.

The circumstances of this case (1) were the land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, and 3; (4) the land was divided and land categoryed into each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6 through 11; (7) the land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 13; and each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 10 and 11, listed in the separate sheet No. 12, were the land listed in the annexed sheet No. 12.

Attached Form

The registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the deceased N and the defendant was completed on September 12, 1983 as the registration office of Goyang-gu District Court, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, 1983 by inheritance No. 19021.

The Plaintiff’s prior heir L(L) died on January 23, 1937, and on November 11, 1972, the deceased on November 11, 1972.

The heir of the networkO was deceased on September 19, 197, and Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff C, who were married in the same family register, the spouse of the deceased P, A, The net Q, and Plaintiff D, who were married in the same family register. The deceased on September 19, 197, and the deceased on November 9, 199 and succeeded to the net Q. The deceased on November 9, 199 and became the heir of Plaintiff A, B, C, and D.

The network R died on April 14, 1950 and the two networks M became a sole heir.

net M. .....

arrow