The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 80 hours of community service, 40 hours of compliance driving instruction) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant reflects the crime, the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by agreement with the victim, voluntarily surrenders after the crime, and the fact that there is no record of the crime exceeding the fine is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case committed by the defendant while driving a motor vehicle, driving a motor vehicle in a traffic accident, and stopping the motor vehicle owned by the victim immediately and does not take necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person, and is disadvantageous to the nature of the crime.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.