The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant did not have the same criminal record, that the defendant was physically disabled, that the defendant was physically disabled, and that economic circumstances are difficult, but the period of selling fake petroleum products has reached five months, and the defendant continued to operate his business in the same place until November 30, 2012, while he was subject to three times or more after he was first controlled on July 23, 2012, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.