beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On September 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with labor by habitual fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on September 20, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence on January 25, 2014.
[Criminal Facts] The Defendant was habitually informed of 20 victims and received a total of 4 million won as follows.
1. On October 1, 2014, the victim C: (a) on the part of the victim C, the victim C was transferred 2.2 million won in cash from the victim’s new cooperation F account in the name of the Defendant, and was transferred 7.4 million won in total to the same account on October 10, 2014, and received KRW 3.4 million in total by being transferred 7.4 million to the same account under the victim’s name on the part of the victim C, who did not think that he/she would work at the restaurant even though he/she did not think that he/she would work at the restaurant.
2. On November 24, 2014, the victim G was transferred from the victim’s new bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, on the following grounds: (a) the victim G was “I restaurant” operated by the victim G of H building 107 on the Namyang-si, Namyang-si; and (b) the facts did not think of being employed in the restaurant and working at the restaurant; and (c) the victim did not want to pay 1.6 million won in advance to the president of the cafeteria who was previously employed.”
3. On November 26, 2014, the victim J made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, despite having no idea to work in a restaurant, was issued KRW 2.7 million in cash on the same day to the victim, on November 30, 2014, on the part of the victim J of the victim J, which was operated by the victim J of the victim J at K, the Defendant would have to work in a restaurant.”
4. The Defendant: (a) around December 8, 2014, in the “O” restaurant operated by the injured party M in the N in Sungsung-si, the Defendant was employed in the restaurant and did not think of the fact; (b) on the other hand, the Defendant used the victim to work in the restaurant.