A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a B Poter II cargo vehicle.

On October 25, 2015, the Defendant driven the said cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.105% during blood transfusions, and led to a two-lane road in front of the D cafeteria located in Ansan City C, while driving the said cargo under the influence of alcohol content of 0.105%.

At this time, the defendant was followed by F. F. M. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F., prior to the same direction, the defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle in an excessively close vicinity, and the back part of the off part of the off part of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, which was driven by a vehicle stop at the front left-hand side of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, due to which the Defendant lost the center of the above off-to-hand vehicle, was pushed down to the right-hand side, and the Defendant shocked the back part of the back part of the victim’s G (Ye, 57 years old)’s H E-H car driving that was driven on the two-lanes.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the above E, such as a duplic cage, including a cupage cupage, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the above duplic cupture, etc., to the above duplicated I (M, 70 years of age) for approximately 7 weeks of the right duplic cupage.

2. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with approximately 1.5 km from the J apartment 101 to the D cafeteria located in C from the J apartment 101 to the D cafeteria. In the influence of alcohol content 0.105%, the Defendant driven B Poter II truck under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. The relevant legal provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;