The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. The lower court determined to the effect that the nonobviousness of the instant patent invention (patent registration number No. 724301) Claim No. 1 (hereinafter “instant Claim No. 1”) of this case (patent registration number No. 724301) using the name “the method of sealing the descriptive home as the sacultic material and attaching the saculic sacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacaca) is denied by comparable inventions 3 on the following grounds: (a)

Inventions 1 and 3 of the instant case and comparable inventions 3 are the same technology field in that both of them relate to the method of reclaiming the entry (shot board) of the home (shot board) in the spool spool spool spool spool (spool spool spool).

B. The “ home” of the instant Claim No. 1 and the “slid of comparable inventions 3 are identical in that both of the “ home” and the “slids” of the instant Claim No. 1 are factors that interfere with the studio polymal performance, such as hip, Finle, and cream, which undermine the function of the studiopool, and both inventions are common in technical ideas that regulate the average molecular volume of the studio studio (non-studiomar) of the studiopool (non-studio).

C. In the instant Claim No. 1, “a composition of which the volume average molecule weight content is within the range of 3,000 to 20,000”, “a composition of which the Home is sealed and sealed by spreading the Home to the dydropool mar by spreading the volume of the dydropool mar, and by building it by spreading it on the home on the home page” as the average weight weight of comparable invention 3.